1 |
On 13.09.2013 14:14, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On 13/09/2013 12:10, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote: |
3 |
>> Hi people, |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> I am about to update KDE from 4.10.4 to 4.11.1. |
6 |
>> Is it possible to avoid installing various nepomuks and akonadis which |
7 |
> |
8 |
> No |
9 |
|
10 |
Pity. |
11 |
|
12 |
>> appear to be required now? I have set USE=-semantic-desktop but it |
13 |
>> doesn't seem to help. |
14 |
>> My current KDE installation is quite happy without that stuff (which |
15 |
>> also brings along tons of other crap). |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> The KDE maintainers posted quite extensively about this some time back. |
19 |
|
20 |
Some time back I heard that KDE devs were striving to make KDE more |
21 |
modular. |
22 |
|
23 |
> It is too hard to try and extract semantic-desktop out of the KDE build |
24 |
> whilst not breaking everything else. What you now do is allow the stuff |
25 |
> to be built, and disable the function in System Settings. |
26 |
|
27 |
Well why wasn't it too hard before? It's not quite obvious why one's got |
28 |
to "extract" some additional functionality, as opposed to including it |
29 |
when needed. A strange approach, all in all. |
30 |
|
31 |
> What this in effect means is you spend an extra 20 minutes building and |
32 |
> have a few more meg of disk space consumed by code than you never run. |
33 |
|
34 |
I personally care little about the megs, but the moral effect. Thousands |
35 |
of people posted much about these doubtful features and disabling them, |
36 |
and asked not to include them into KDE base, but all effort was vain. In |
37 |
trite words, KDE followed the windows way: we know better what you need... |
38 |
(Okay, no offense.) |
39 |
BTW, it seems that mysql is also a hard dependency for QT now. At least, |
40 |
the average joe can't be scorned any more for not having a "server". Hey |
41 |
to all localhost admins! :) |
42 |
|
43 |
Thanks for clarification, Alan. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Best wishes, |
47 |
Yuri K. Shatroff |