| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:29 -0400, Mark wrote: |
| 2 |
> Can anyone who has done it comment on the downside (if any) of |
| 3 |
> bringing email in-house, as opposed to continuing to pay a hosting |
| 4 |
> provider? My plan is to have a separate server, sitting by itself in |
| 5 |
> the DMZ, so the internal LAN should remain relatively safe. The DSL |
| 6 |
> provider we use will host the DNS records (MX). We have a top-notch |
| 7 |
> firewall already in place, but this is the first step we've taken |
| 8 |
> toward making anything available inbound, so I'm cautiously |
| 9 |
> optimistic. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> -- |
| 12 |
> Mark |
| 13 |
> [unwieldy legal disclaimer would go here - feel free to type your own] |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I have an in-house mail server. In my experience, the only problem I |
| 16 |
have with it is when our cable Internet goes out. I pay $99USD a month |
| 17 |
for cable Internet with a static IP and the cable usually goes out for a |
| 18 |
couple of hours on the weekends (grrr). Other than that I haven't |
| 19 |
really had any problems with it... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives