Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:57:58
Message-Id: aa149ceb-4bfd-5be5-7b7b-132e12e06545@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network by David Haller
1 On 12/18/2017 03:25 PM, David Haller wrote:
2 >
3 > ISTR, .localdomain is the new .local...
4 >
5 > BTW: I hate it how .local got ursurped by zeroconf/mDNS.
6 >
7
8 You were never allowed to use .local in the first place =P
9
10 I learned some interesting things from RFC 8244, the first being that
11 they have an up-to-date list of reserved names:
12
13 https://www.iana.org/assignments/special-use-domain-names/special-use-domain-names.xhtml
14
15 and the second being that there are two exceptions, because oops, they
16 didn't follow their own rules (.home and ipv4only.arpa). localdomain
17 isn't on there.
18
19 There are no safe, free names to use for an internal network. On the one
20 hand, RFC 8244 makes a decent argument that this is a good thing,
21 because it guarantees that every hostname is globally unique (so if I
22 copy/paste a URL to you, it goes the same place on your machine as it
23 did mine). On the other hand, I hate the idea of paying some bureaucrat
24 to be able to use my own network.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network Wols Lists <antlists@××××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com>