Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Hemmann
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] alternatives to audacious?
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:53:23
Message-Id: 200706051247.56284.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] alternatives to audacious? by Denis
1 On Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007, Denis wrote:
2 > > Amarok is feature-rich, but heavy indeed. I don't recommend it for a
3 > > drop-in XMMS replacement. If you like the idea of editing mp3 tags and
4 > > organzing your music really nicely, browsing it 3 different ways and
5 > > seeing cover art from amazon.com and such, amarok is for you.
6 >
7 > Ha... yea, my use flags have "-gnome" and "-kde" in them, and I run a
8 > very simple fluxbox environment... I just want the music player to
9 > have a decent graphical interface, but just the essential features,
10 > without bloat.
11 >
12 > It seems like I got the Audacious to work... But I still miss the XMMS ;-)
13
14 alsaplayer?
15
16 it is small, fast, you can run douzends of instances at the same time. Play
17 forwards, backwards, at a lot of different speeds - and it has even a
18 playlist.
19 --
20 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] alternatives to audacious? vladimir@×××××××××.info
Re: [gentoo-user] alternatives to audacious? Denis <denis.che@×××××.com>