Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: darren kirby <bulliver@×××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:58:44
Message-Id: 200610112255.53295.bulliver@badcomputer.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency... by Daniel Barkalow
1 quoth the Daniel Barkalow:
2 > >
3 > > What's up with this? I really don't want netkit-rsh installed
4 > > either...xsm changelog says nothing...
5 >
6 > You want to be looking at xinit's info; turns out you want the "minimal"
7 > USE flag if you don't want to include the things used by the default
8 > Xsession, which includes xsm (which has, as far as I can tell, always used
9 > netkit-rsh).
10 >
11 > -Daniel
12 > *This .sig left intentionally blank*
13
14 Thanks, and sorry for the hysteria. I have rebuilt xinit with minimal and
15 netkit-rsh is no longer a deep dependency. I am very unsure what is strictly
16 required with the modular Xorg.
17
18 -d
19 --
20 darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
21 "...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
22 - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972
23 --
24 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency... Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>