| 1 |
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:31:20 +0100 |
| 2 |
Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@×××××.fr> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > Then again, using initramfs is yet-another-component waiting to |
| 5 |
> > break. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Knowing Murphy's Law, it will one day fuck up everything. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> And the mdev alternative won't follow this law? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
It's not immune to it, just statistically less likely to be affected. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
mdev sans initramfs is a less complex solution than udev plus |
| 15 |
initramfs. Ergo, all other things being equal, less bits to break. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Alan McKinnnon |
| 21 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives