1 |
On 18/02/2014 23:32, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
2 |
> And you always can run other legacy logger alongside the journal, and |
3 |
> have both things; binary logs for fast retrieval, and text logs if you |
4 |
> so desire. |
5 |
> |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
Please do not use that phrase legacy in this context. |
9 |
|
10 |
Classic syslogging is not legacy. It is current. The systemd method is |
11 |
not the new thing that replaces and deprecates the old thing, it is |
12 |
merely a new (and unproven) kid on the block. |
13 |
|
14 |
"Legacy" in the context of logging can only really mean the old |
15 |
syslogger protocol as implemented by syslogd. It has no standard behind |
16 |
it and is correctly described as "whatever syslogd does", whereas there |
17 |
is a new syslogging protocol, with an RFC. This is most certainly not a |
18 |
legacy standard. |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Alan McKinnon |
23 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |