1 |
On Donnerstag, 7. Juni 2007, Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
2 |
> seems, certain wranglers are for killing bugs of |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > > specific persons ;-O |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > well, Jakub is very fast closing bugs - and sometimes he closes |
7 |
> > them too fast... this is nothing new - and arguing with him in a |
8 |
> > civil manner usually solves that. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I'm some bit confused that the wranglers should do such decisions |
11 |
> at all (if they're not also involved in the affected package). |
12 |
|
13 |
because it is their job to filter out noise so 'real' devs can concentrate on |
14 |
the 'real' bugs. They are the first line of defence. And since bug wranglers |
15 |
are humans, they can't know everything and sometimes they make a mistake. Bug |
16 |
wranglers are the first filter, if the bug is not assigned to a team. And |
17 |
sometimes, they filter things, that should not be filtered out. Stay calm, |
18 |
explain the situation - and in my experience it will resolved. But having a |
19 |
fit on this ml does not help anybody - it just looks bad. And it makes YOU |
20 |
look bad. |
21 |
|
22 |
I have been at the wrong end of bug wranglers (Moc) and java devs (when I |
23 |
complained years ago, that updating one java vm, would change the user vm, |
24 |
even if that package would be unaffected. For example user vm sun, update of |
25 |
blackdown vm, user vm now blackdown vm. It took a lot of discussion, but it |
26 |
was worth it). |
27 |
|
28 |
Did I complain on this mailing list? |
29 |
No. |
30 |
Because I know that the devs are humans and that they are volunteers. |
31 |
Did that stop me from filing bugs? |
32 |
Heck no! |
33 |
I just opened one yesterday and it was fixed in less than 12h... without fuss |
34 |
or discussions. |
35 |
|
36 |
Some people forget, that the devs are unpaid volunteers who are not perfect |
37 |
beings, but humans - and some people forget, that the world does not revolve |
38 |
around them. |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |