| 1 |
* Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > And then ? |
| 5 |
> > Hope that mozilla-launcher gets repaired by itself ? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> no? but if it works that way, it is not even defective.. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
It doesn't. Why do you assume it would ? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
<snip> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > Isn't it exactly the job of the bugwranglers to delegate |
| 14 |
> > bugs to the responsible persons ? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> and bug wranglers are just humans. And humans a) are not perfect |
| 17 |
> and b) sometimes make errors. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Ok, no problem. But is that the fault of the reporter ? Obviously not. |
| 20 |
If a bug gets to the wrong dev, he simply kicks it back or directly |
| 21 |
to the right person. Trivial. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> > Sometimes it seems, certain wranglers are for killing bugs of |
| 24 |
> > specific persons ;-O |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> well, Jakub is very fast closing bugs - and sometimes he closes |
| 27 |
> them too fast... this is nothing new - and arguing with him in a |
| 28 |
> civil manner usually solves that. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I'm some bit confused that the wranglers should do such decisions |
| 31 |
at all (if they're not also involved in the affected package). |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
cu |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 37 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
| 38 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 39 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
| 40 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
| 41 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
| 42 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
| 43 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives