| 1 |
On Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2007, Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
| 2 |
> * Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <snip> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > so first you went to the wrong bugzilla and made a big fuss. |
| 7 |
> > Then you went to the gentoo-bugzilla and made even more fuss. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Yes, I first expected it to be an firefox bug, so I filed the bug there. |
| 10 |
> After I found out that the ff source didn't contain that error message, |
| 11 |
> I had I look elsewhere and learned that it's produced by an Gentoo |
| 12 |
> specific script coming from another package. So I filed the bug there. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> BTW: what do you exactly mean with "made a big fuss" ? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > And in less than a day you have concluded that nobody is interessted |
| 17 |
> > in your problem or patch. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Yes, because certain (responsible) people directly expressed it to me, |
| 20 |
> again (as usual). |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> <snip> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> > You are really fast - but have you ever tried to create a NEW PROFILE |
| 25 |
> > WITH THE CORRECT DIR INSTEAD OF SYMLINKS? NO? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> That's far, far away from my problem. I do not need any new profile, |
| 28 |
> and the profile is okay. The symlinks have to be there, explicitly. |
| 29 |
> Firefox does not have any slightest problem with that. (why should it ?) |
| 30 |
> It's Gentoo's "mozilla-launcher", which introduces that problem. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> > Just start firefox with firefox -Profilemanager |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> And then ? |
| 35 |
> Hope that mozilla-launcher gets repaired by itself ? |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
no? but if it works that way, it is not even defective.. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> > Oh, and retry. Maybe adding the author of mozilla-launcher to the bug? |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> Do I have permission for that ? That's new to me. |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> > Because, you know, the bugwranglers aren't perfect-all-knowing persons |
| 45 |
> > - and you are so smart, you should be able to find the dev who is |
| 46 |
> > responsible for mozilla-launcher... |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> Isn't it exactly the job of the bugwranglers to delegate bugs to the |
| 49 |
> responsible persons ? |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
and bug wranglers are just humans. And humans a) are not perfect and b) |
| 53 |
sometimes make errors. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
> Sometimes it seems, certain wranglers are for killing bugs of specific |
| 57 |
> persons ;-O |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
well, Jakub is very fast closing bugs - and sometimes he closes them too |
| 60 |
fast... this is nothing new - and arguing with him in a civil manner usually |
| 61 |
solves that. |
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
> |
| 64 |
> > For the rest - a typical Enrico-mail. Please don't stop. Go on, nothing |
| 65 |
> > to see here. |
| 66 |
> |
| 67 |
> Yeah, I already know you don't like me. I dont care. |
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
no, I don't like the manner you regularly make a lot of noise about nothing. |
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
I don't know you, so I can't know if I like you or not. |
| 72 |
-- |
| 73 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives