1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:48 on Tuesday 07 September 2010, Al did |
2 |
opine thusly: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > I'm afraid you lost me there. Why does it matter where the archive is? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Sure, it is most important to have an archive at all. When using a |
7 |
> newsreader the minimun I do is to scan the headers of the past, to |
8 |
> avoid the discussion of a solved question. That is faster then |
9 |
> openenig a webbrowser to search an archive. When subscribing to a |
10 |
> mailinglist, I don't even know the topics of yesterday. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Al |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Dude, |
16 |
|
17 |
Do you comprehend the simplicity of what folk here are telling you? |
18 |
|
19 |
We do not have a news service because we[1] do not feel we need one and do not |
20 |
desire one. Therefore it is *highly* unlikely there will be one. You can use |
21 |
gmane. 'kthanxforplayingbye |
22 |
|
23 |
Hardly anyone here is listening to you or taking you seriously, and here's |
24 |
why: |
25 |
|
26 |
You are self-confessed new to Linux and Volker already spotted by are likely |
27 |
new to Linux as well. You are not (yet) part of this community for real, and |
28 |
you have no street cred in this meritocracy. What you need to do now is |
29 |
|
30 |
- build up a posting history |
31 |
- to do that you need experience |
32 |
- to do that you need to ask and listen |
33 |
- then help others in turn |
34 |
|
35 |
I've been here for 4 years. I'm one of the conceited loud-mouths and I still |
36 |
get myself regularly bitch-slapped by people who are just as good as I am. |
37 |
From that position, I actually feel quite personally offended by your |
38 |
attitude. I've earned some of my attitude stripes. You have yet to begin. |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
[1] In this context, "we" shall be understood to mean "the majority, by common |
42 |
consensus" |
43 |
-- |
44 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |