1 |
Christopher Copeland wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On 27 Nov 2007, at 10:19, Mick wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Hi All, |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> I have noticed this problem when I try to connect to two different |
8 |
>> machines in |
9 |
>> two different continents. One is on cable (US) the other on ISDN ADSL |
10 |
>> (Greece). In the evening and sometimes weekends ssh connections from my |
11 |
>> laptop to these two PCs are either taking ages or time out. This is ssh |
12 |
>> connections to sshd which is listening to random ports in the 200+ or |
13 |
>> 12000+ |
14 |
>> ranges. If I eventually manage to connect the latency is ridiculous |
15 |
>> - up to |
16 |
>> 5 seconds! Sometimes I enter a passwd, if I can get that far and |
17 |
>> then wait |
18 |
>> for hours with no response. Eventually, I have to close the terminal. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> Tracerouting does not get through although some clever tcptraceroute |
21 |
>> strings |
22 |
>> may on occasions (intermittently) get through. |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> Both servers run on domestic networks. BTW, ssh-ing to servers in |
25 |
>> datacenters |
26 |
>> with their big fiber-optic pipes, although relatively slow in peak |
27 |
>> times, |
28 |
>> always gets through. |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> The strange thing is that there is no problem talking to these boxen |
31 |
>> while |
32 |
>> they run Google-Talk, it's only the ssh connection that seems to suffer. |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> Have you come across such a problem before? How can I troubleshoot |
35 |
>> it? In |
36 |
>> this day and age of broadband connections it seems strange to get worse |
37 |
>> performance than on a dialup network . . . I mean I have run VNC |
38 |
>> connections |
39 |
>> over a 56k dial up with more responsiveness than this! |
40 |
>> -- |
41 |
>> Regards, |
42 |
>> Mick |
43 |
> |
44 |
> I've run across the same kind of issues on certain ISPs when using |
45 |
> non-standard ports for sshd. Given other connections (Gtalk) are |
46 |
> working, the first thing I would try in your position is to see if |
47 |
> there is a difference when using 22 versus your random port. With |
48 |
> certain ISPs in the UK I've found SSH connections to be unusable on |
49 |
> anything but the default port. Of course it has everything to do with |
50 |
> the "smart" traffic shaping at the ISP and there was nothing I could |
51 |
> do about it. |
52 |
> -- |
53 |
> Christopher |
54 |
|
55 |
I also ran into something like this on a local network. I corrected |
56 |
this by adding the remote systems to my hosts file and putting the entry |
57 |
in the host file on the remote system. I'm not sure what affect this |
58 |
had but it worked like a charm after that. I guess it lets each other |
59 |
know who the other is or something. |
60 |
|
61 |
Hope that helps. |
62 |
|
63 |
Dale |
64 |
|
65 |
:-) :-) :-) :-) |
66 |
-- |
67 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |