| 1 |
but, with pam-0.99.6.3-r1, have you tried to make a "revdep-rebuild -p |
| 2 |
-i" ? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Lorenzo Marussi |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Il giorno mar, 14/11/2006 alle 17.40 +0100, Alexander Skwar ha scritto: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> · Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > On Tuesday 14 November 2006 15:23, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 12 |
> >> > Any clues from revdep-rebuild? |
| 13 |
> >> > I take it you did log out and in again, |
| 14 |
> >> |
| 15 |
> >> Yes. |
| 16 |
> >> |
| 17 |
> >> Reboot: No. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > That's worth a try. I know it goes against the grain but at this stage |
| 20 |
> > what do you have to lose? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Rebooting is hard. That's a server, after all. And right now, I downgraded |
| 23 |
> to Pam 78. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> > At least you are guaranteed that every unlink |
| 26 |
> > really is unlinked. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Hm. But why should this do something? I mean, I re-compiled |
| 29 |
> PAM and sudo now several times. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Alexander Skwar |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> Only someone with nothing to be sorry for smiles back at the rear of an |
| 34 |
> elephant. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
Archives