1 |
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 4:53 PM Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> It took some digging around but I found out it is a AMD Phenom 9750 quad |
4 |
> core. |
5 |
|
6 |
You might want to hook a Kill-a-watt to that and see how much power it |
7 |
uses. Those older AMD processors were really inefficient. |
8 |
|
9 |
One thing I've come to appreciate with anything that runs 24x7 is to |
10 |
consider the energy bill to run things. That's why the bulk of my |
11 |
storage is running on ARM SBCs. Those things use almost no power when |
12 |
idle, while even a modern amd64 system will often use more at idle |
13 |
than an ARM will at full load. |
14 |
|
15 |
Most of the newer CPUs are MUCH better in performance per watt as |
16 |
well. A server that uses just 50W 24x7 costs about $65/yr (and I have |
17 |
pretty cheap electricity due to a 1yr contract - odds are it costs |
18 |
quite a bit more for most of this list). That's a fairly significant |
19 |
amount of money so it can pay to optimize things, especially if you |
20 |
replace what was a power-hungry performance CPU from 10 years ago with |
21 |
a lower-end CPU from today that probably has double the performance |
22 |
for 10% of the power draw. Obviously if you want bleeding edge the |
23 |
electricity bill won't cover the up-front costs, but lower end CPUs |
24 |
are very cost-effective and efficient compared to really old systems |
25 |
that people tend to use for these kinds of projects. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Rich |