1 |
Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
2 |
> Am Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 01:07:43PM -0600 schrieb Dale: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> See other reply that has more info. I'm pretty sure it is the |
5 |
>> encryption maxing out the CPU. |
6 |
> The most simple benchmark is dd: unlock the LUKS layer on your HDD. then |
7 |
> first read from the HDD directly and then from the LUKS device: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> dd if=<path/to/raw/HDD> of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000 |
10 |
> dd if=<path/to/cryptdevice> of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000 |
11 |
> |
12 |
> It will tell you the transfer rate in MB/s. |
13 |
|
14 |
One thing about it, the speed is likely what its going to be. Whether |
15 |
it is the encryption or whatever, it is what it is. It did improve a |
16 |
little with the 1GB network card but not a whole lot. |
17 |
|
18 |
>> Mostly, I need a better CPU. If I encrypt anyway. |
19 |
> Did you ever tell us the exact CPU you have in there? All I can remember is |
20 |
> it has 4 cores. And some AMD processor with a II in its name, but that was |
21 |
> you main rig, right? |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
It took some digging around but I found out it is a AMD Phenom 9750 quad |
26 |
core. It lists some extensions but I don't see any that are related to |
27 |
encryption. No AES or whatever for sure. Unless I missed it. I used |
28 |
the command cpuid to get this info on BSD. |
29 |
|
30 |
My main rig has a AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core Processor and 32GBs of memory. |
31 |
I'm thinking about a new rig eventually. Rig is getting a little age on |
32 |
it. ;-) |
33 |
|
34 |
Dale |
35 |
|
36 |
:-) :-) |