| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 22:01 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: |
| 2 |
> java hates me. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> root@jmaa ~ $ revdep-rebuild -p |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Checking reverse dependencies... |
| 7 |
> Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by any package update, |
| 8 |
> will be recompiled. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Collecting system binaries and libraries... done. |
| 11 |
> (/root/.revdep-rebuild.1_files) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH... done. |
| 14 |
> (/root/.revdep-rebuild.2_ldpath) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Checking dynamic linking consistency... |
| 17 |
> broken /opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02/jre/lib/i386/libjsoundalsa.so |
| 18 |
> (requires libasound.so.2) |
| 19 |
> done. |
| 20 |
> (/root/.revdep-rebuild.3_rebuild) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Assigning files to ebuilds... done. |
| 23 |
> (/root/.revdep-rebuild.4_ebuilds) |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Evaluating package order... done. |
| 26 |
> (/root/.revdep-rebuild.5_order) |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> All prepared. Starting rebuild... |
| 29 |
> emerge --oneshot --nodeps -p |
| 30 |
> =dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02 |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order: |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Calculating dependencies ...done! |
| 35 |
> [ebuild R ] dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02 |
| 36 |
> Now you can remove -p (or --pretend) from arguments and |
| 37 |
> re-run revdep-rebuild. |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> I already reemerged dev-java/blackdown-jdk, which is the only java |
| 40 |
> installed, and didn't forget to env-update and source /etc/profile. |
| 41 |
> Running revdep-rebuild is useless, as a second revdep-rebuild -p will |
| 42 |
> still give the same error message. |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> And why should something named |
| 45 |
> /opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02/jre/lib/i386/libjsoundalsa.so exist? I don't |
| 46 |
> have the "alsa" USE flag set, for the excelent reason that this is an |
| 47 |
> office workstation with no sound equipment whatsoever. |
| 48 |
> Could it be that somehow the ebuild is ignoring this point? |
| 49 |
> I unset "browserplugin" before emerging, just in case this was pulling |
| 50 |
> sound support. Still, "mozilla" was set; the emerge says that the former |
| 51 |
> USE variable is the latter renamed... |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> What to do? Can I safely ignore the revdep-rebuild messages? |
| 54 |
I think you can safely ignore that (unless you're running java |
| 55 |
applications that use sound/alsa). the java packages are binary, that |
| 56 |
means that you don't compile it according to your use flags, you install |
| 57 |
the "whole package", so some libraries (like libalsasound.so) will |
| 58 |
complain if you don't have alsa support. I'm having this problem with |
| 59 |
opera and libXm but I just ignore it. |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
btw, is there anyway to tell revdep-rebuild to ignore a package? it's |
| 62 |
really not comfortable to run revdep-rebuild -p and then manually |
| 63 |
re-install the packages that complain (because I don't want it to |
| 64 |
re-install opera every time). |
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
Bye |
| 67 |
-- |
| 68 |
Haim |
Archives