Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:11:06
Message-Id: 49bf44f10712151100t4a7c7490if8c845a294c89766@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules by Grant
1 > > The real blocker for features that I'd like Gentoo to support is Portage.
2 > > There is only 1½ people working on it and changing anything in it is hard
3 > > because Portage is a horrible mess. There's plenty of activity in the tree
4 > > but new desired features cannot be used in the tree until Portage supports
5 > > them. It also doesn't make matters better that over the years all sorts of
6 > > weird hacks (that now have to be supported) have been added to the tree
7 > > instead of waiting for proper solutions. Most people who are capable of
8 > > helping to improve Portage just don't want to touch it.
9 >
10 > Would you say that portage is the main block in the way of Gentoo's
11 > continued progress?
12
13 Actually I guess that's pretty much exactly what you said. I didn't
14 realize portage is where the problem lies. In fact, I thought we were
15 all still proud of portage I'm going to think about this some.
16
17 - Grant
18 --
19 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk>