1 |
> > So, what would need to happen for one of these projects to take off |
2 |
> > would be one or more people to be in charge of it and organize it, and |
3 |
> > they recruit as many people as possible to work on the project along |
4 |
> > with them? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> The real blocker for features that I'd like Gentoo to support is Portage. |
7 |
> There is only 1½ people working on it and changing anything in it is hard |
8 |
> because Portage is a horrible mess. There's plenty of activity in the tree |
9 |
> but new desired features cannot be used in the tree until Portage supports |
10 |
> them. It also doesn't make matters better that over the years all sorts of |
11 |
> weird hacks (that now have to be supported) have been added to the tree |
12 |
> instead of waiting for proper solutions. Most people who are capable of |
13 |
> helping to improve Portage just don't want to touch it. |
14 |
|
15 |
Would you say that portage is the main block in the way of Gentoo's |
16 |
continued progress? |
17 |
|
18 |
> > Does that recruitment generally take the form of volunteers finding the |
19 |
> > project as opposed to the project finding volunteers? Any light to shed on |
20 |
> > this process for me? |
21 |
> |
22 |
> If there's one thing we definitely don't need it's more clueless people who |
23 |
> become developers just because they claim they want to do something. Being |
24 |
> stalled is better than major screw ups that hurt everyone and than moving in |
25 |
> the wrong direction. |
26 |
|
27 |
I don't have aspirations of becoming a developer if that's what you |
28 |
mean. Thanks though. |
29 |
|
30 |
- Grant |
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |