1 |
On Saturday 15 December 2007 20:00:54 Grant wrote: |
2 |
> > > The real blocker for features that I'd like Gentoo to support is |
3 |
> > > Portage. There is only 1½ people working on it and changing anything in |
4 |
> > > it is hard because Portage is a horrible mess. There's plenty of |
5 |
> > > activity in the tree but new desired features cannot be used in the |
6 |
> > > tree until Portage supports them. It also doesn't make matters better |
7 |
> > > that over the years all sorts of weird hacks (that now have to be |
8 |
> > > supported) have been added to the tree instead of waiting for proper |
9 |
> > > solutions. Most people who are capable of helping to improve Portage |
10 |
> > > just don't want to touch it. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Would you say that portage is the main block in the way of Gentoo's |
13 |
> > continued progress? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Actually I guess that's pretty much exactly what you said. I didn't |
16 |
> realize portage is where the problem lies. In fact, I thought we were |
17 |
> all still proud of portage I'm going to think about this some. |
18 |
|
19 |
It all depends on what kind of features you're interested in. The features I |
20 |
happen to be interested in requires ebuild changes (which means that me using |
21 |
another package manager doesn't help) *and* requires package manager support |
22 |
before said ebuild changes can happen. Therefore for me Portage is a |
23 |
blocker... |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Bo Andresen |