| 1 |
On Saturday 22 December 2007 02:50:54 David Relson wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm experimenting with paludis. Seems fine, though a bit verbose and |
| 3 |
> cryptic. Running "paludis -i world" produces: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Unhandled exception: |
| 6 |
> * In program paludis -i world: |
| 7 |
> * When making environment from specification '': |
| 8 |
> * When loading paludis configuration: |
| 9 |
> * When reading use file '/etc/paludis/use.conf': |
| 10 |
> * When adding source '/etc/paludis/use.conf' as a use file: |
| 11 |
> * When validating use flag name '': |
| 12 |
> * Name '' is not a valid use flag name (paludis::UseFlagNameError) |
| 13 |
[...] |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Apparently you have a use.conf entry with no use flag (which makes that entry |
| 16 |
invalid). Paludis is stricter than Portage so it won't just ignore invalid |
| 17 |
input. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> What am I missing that produces the "unhandled exception" and "migrate |
| 20 |
> to Paludis configuration" messages? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
We've received rather few reports from people testing the portage environment |
| 23 |
so it hasn't had much testing. It also disables some features that are |
| 24 |
available when using the paludis environment. Hence the warning. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Bo Andresen |
Archives