1 |
On Wednesday 07 Sep 2016 20:28:27 Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 07 Sep 2016 20:51:51 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
> > On 07/09/2016 19:53, Simon Thelen wrote: |
4 |
> > > On 16-09-07 at 18:41, Mick wrote: |
5 |
> > >> On Thursday 08 Sep 2016 00:47:13 Andrew Lowe wrote: |
6 |
> > >>> On 07/09/16 23:45, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
7 |
> > >>>> Hello list, |
8 |
> > >>>> |
9 |
> > >>>> As I said in the "emerge @system" thread, I've built a fresh ~amd64 |
10 |
> > >>>> system |
11 |
> > >>>> on this i7 box. I also created a new user directory for myself, |
12 |
> > >>>> copying |
13 |
> > >>>> in |
14 |
> > >>>> only .bash*, .gkrellm2 and .mozilla. |
15 |
> > >>>> |
16 |
> > >>>> After spending a good long time setting up KDE and friends just the |
17 |
> > >>>> way |
18 |
> > >>>> I |
19 |
> > >>>> like them, the one remaining task was to set up KMail and import my |
20 |
> > >>>> 1000-or- so messages. That worked all right, with just the one same |
21 |
> > >>>> exception as before: KMail's recycle bin is call "trash" in the |
22 |
> > >>>> folder |
23 |
> > >>>> list, but the right-click menu on it offers to "empty wastebin". |
24 |
> > >>>> |
25 |
> > >>>> I'm sure I have all my linguas, l10ns i18ns and everything set up |
26 |
> > >>>> right, |
27 |
> > >>>> so |
28 |
> > >>>> I think I'm just seeing an intermediate stage in KMail development. |
29 |
> > >>>> |
30 |
> > >>>> Is anyone else seeing this? |
31 |
> > >>>> |
32 |
> > >>> I'm reading this whilst sitting in Perth, Australia so both |
33 |
should |
34 |
> |
35 |
> read |
36 |
> |
37 |
> > >>> "Rubbish Bin" or possibly "Wheelie Bin" ;) |
38 |
> > >> |
39 |
> > >> One IMAP4 account of mine shows 'Bin' and another shows 'Trash'. As |
40 |
> > >> I |
41 |
> > >> understand it you need to configure the locale on the mail server. |
42 |
> > > |
43 |
> > > IMAP itself does not have a concept of "Trash", the creation of such a |
44 |
> > > mailbox is the prerogative of the client (unless the server itself |
45 |
> > > feels |
46 |
> > > that the imap client doesn't know what it's doing and moves deleted |
47 |
> > > emails into a different mailbox; not that I've ever seen a mail server |
48 |
> > > do that), therefore changing the locale on the mail server won't help |
49 |
> > > and it is indeed something on the client that needs to be changed. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> Yes, you're right. The IMAP4 protocol uses tags to signify deleted |
52 |
> messages, which until they are expunged stay on the server. |
53 |
> |
54 |
> Most mail clients typically move messages flagged as deleted into a |
55 |
> bin/trash/deleted IMAP4 mailbox (i.e. the representation of a mail client |
56 |
> folder) if configured to do so. The name of the mailbox is down to the |
57 |
> user, if created manually, or down to the presets of the mail client GUI. |
58 |
> If a webmail or desktop mail client is used, then the language settings |
59 |
> (on the webmail server or local PC) come into play. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> One of my accounts has GB settings, hence the 'bin' folder. The other |
62 |
> appears to have US settings, hence the 'trash' folder. |
63 |
> |
64 |
> > Or maybe wastebin in "empty wastebin" is a simple common noun whereas |
65 |
> > the folder called "Trash" is a proper noun. |
66 |
> > |
67 |
> > KDE widgets in my experience often have oddities like this. |
68 |
> > |
69 |
> > If it's something like that, you may have to find the file containing |
70 |
> > display strings and change it there |
71 |
> |
72 |
> This may be a bit drastic. In my experience changing locale on the local |
73 |
> client, or the remote webmail server if one exists sorts this out. |
74 |
> |
75 |
> Using local Vs server-side subscriptions on Kmail may affect the outcome |
76 |
> between different clients. |
77 |
|
78 |
Sorry gents, but this has nothing to do with IMAP: the phenomenon is purely |
79 |
internal to KMail. Besides, I only have POP3 accounts (which I suppose I |
80 |
could have said before but it didn't seem significant). |
81 |
|
82 |
Alan is closest: it's a matter of string contents somewhere in the KMail |
83 |
code. I just don't know whereabouts - nor do I want to fiddle around in the |
84 |
guts of the program, which is quite fragile enough already. One thing is |
85 |
being defined twice, or else it's defined once and only called in one of the |
86 |
two places where it should be, the other being hard coded. |
87 |
|
88 |
I've noticed both "trash" and "Wastebin" being used at different times over |
89 |
the last year, which hints at instability of program design and development |
90 |
management systems. |
91 |
|
92 |
-- |
93 |
Rgds |
94 |
Peter |