| 1 |
On Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009, Dale wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Hi, |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> >> I'm thinking about upgrading to gcc-4.4 and was wondering if anyone here |
| 7 |
> >> is using it |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > yes |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> >> and if they are having any problems with it. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > no |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> >> I'm using a |
| 16 |
> >> desktop system with KDE and OOo as the biggest packages. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > me too |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> >> No servers or |
| 21 |
> >> anything to worry about like apache. Also using 2.6.30-gentoo-r6 for my |
| 22 |
> >> kernel. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > vanilla-sources here. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > gcc-porting helped tho |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Thanks. What exactly is gcc-porting? I did a quick search and found a |
| 29 |
> page on freshmeat but it seemed to be related to MS-DOS or something. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Dale |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> :-) :-) |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
gcc-porting overlay, install via layman. It had some ebuild/package versions |
| 37 |
that were patched to compile with gcc4.4. AFAIK it is not needed anymore. |
Archives