Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:20:15
Message-Id: CAG2nJkPv9gQVUR0TbgqaTFoZSVfGyOVot1WuH0CDXQ6mKaVD9A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 by Dale
1 On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > One thing that you seem to be missing here. Before Gentoo, I used Mandrake.
3 > It had a init thingy. It caused me much grief and is one reason I left
4 > Mandrake. I also didn't like the upgrade process either but one reason I
5 > chose Gentoo is no init thingy. I wanted to be rid of that. Now, whether
6 > it is udev or not, here comes that stupid init thingy just because someone
7 > doesn't want to put files where they should be which is not inside /usr.
8 >
9 > So, given my history with the init thingy, if I do use a init thingy and it
10 > fails for whatever reason, I'll be installing something else. I done went
11 > down the road of trying to fix one of those stupid things and I have no plan
12 > or desire to do so again. I'm also not going to spend hours reinstalling
13 > Gentoo either. If, more than likely when, the init thingy fails, I'll be
14 > installing something else and I'll most my last sign off message here. One
15 > thing about Linux, there are plenty of distros to pick from . I love Gentoo
16 > but I like to be able to boot up without dealing with a init thingy that I
17 > have to fix when it goes belly up.
18 >
19 > Dale
20 >
21
22 I don't know why people keep humoring this kind of explanation for
23 systemd, udev, or /usr FUD, but this is not a rational way to think. It's
24 the same kind of excuse to say "I'm never going to use any kind of Linux,
25 even Android, because I tried it 3 or 4 times when it was on floppies,
26 and I couldn't get it to work".
27
28 I'm really sorry about your terrible experience with "init thingies" in the
29 past, but you've got to face the facts:
30 1) most distros today, Kubuntu included, bundle an "init thingy"
31 and it works flawlessly for them.
32 2) you really, seriously, have to own up to the fact that your init thingy
33 failing was very likely your fault (because of 1)
34 3) managing "init thingies" has gotten ridiculously easy over time as
35 compared to when you manually had to build them
36
37 Especially that number 2 part. I mean, let's not forget that character
38 of Gentoo as a distribution. Or heck, even *nix distributions in general.
39 *nix distributions give you a lot of tools to arrange your systems the
40 way you want, i.e. choice, but it is always implicitly under the assumption
41 that the choice you're making is an *informed* choice.
42
43 That's why you're asked to read the manual, or check the readmes,
44 or check the sample configs, and in this day and age, do a basic search
45 for working examples, before asking questions. *nix is not, and has
46 never been about being "polite" to users who don't know what they
47 are doing, and has always been about being efficient to users who do.
48
49 I've been recommended to put it "over the top" bluntly before, so:
50 1) STOP. FREAKING. BEING. IRRATIONAL.
51 2) STOP BLAMING INIT THINGIES FOR YOUR MISTAKES. THE DAMNED
52 THINGS WORK.
53 3) If you're scared of doing an init thingy *manually*, just read and do
54 the howto of the simplest init thingy manager in town (dracut? genkernel?).
55 It surely takes less time and effort than migrating to Kubuntu or whatever.
56 --
57 This email is: [ ] actionable [x] fyi [x] social
58 Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no
59 Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>