1 |
William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:32:20PM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote: |
3 |
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:57:06PM -0500, Dale wrote: |
4 |
>>> Bruce Hill wrote: |
5 |
>>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:33:02PM -0500, Dale wrote: |
6 |
>>>>> I'm hoping that since I use eudev, I don't have to worry about this. |
7 |
>>>>> If I do, this could get interesting, again. Dale |
8 |
>>>> Do you have /usr separate from / ? |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> Yep. From my understanding tho, eudev is not supposed to be affected by |
11 |
>>> this problem tho. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> One reason for this being seperate, I have / and /boot on a regular |
14 |
>>> partition and everything else on LVM. Sometimes that /usr gets a bit |
15 |
>>> full. It's not so bad after I moved all the portage stuff out and put |
16 |
>>> it in /var. Now I have to watch /var too. lol |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> Dale |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> You need to read the blog post listed in the news item, as it's not just |
21 |
>> specific to udev anymore. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Bruce is correct; This issue is not specific to udev/eudev/mdev. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I suppose that what I am about to say isn't really relevant, but it is |
26 |
> unfortunate over the past year that people blamed udev specifically for |
27 |
> this. It is true that it does things that don't work if /usr isn't |
28 |
> mounted, but eudev does as well, since it is basically the same code. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> If you read flameeyes' blog post, you will get a better idea of what the |
31 |
> issue involves. It is the entire boot process and how to deal with which |
32 |
> software is considered critical for booting. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> There is no reason to rebuild your server; we aren't telling you you |
35 |
> have to merge /usr into /. The only thing we are saying is that you will |
36 |
> need to use an initramfs if you are going to keep them separate. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> I have a pretty simple setup, but I have been using an initramfs which I |
39 |
> built some time ago with genkernel and I barely know it is there. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> I recommend that you familiarize yourself with genkernel or dracut and |
42 |
> build an initramfs. Since nothing is changing until at least |
43 |
> Nov 1, you can test your initramfs by adding an entry to your boot |
44 |
> loader configuration that uses it and get it set up correctly while you |
45 |
> can still fall back on booting without it. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> I do not recommend that anyone who has separate /usr "do nothing" at |
48 |
> this point. Please re-read the second paragraph of the news item. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> Thanks, |
51 |
> |
52 |
> William |
53 |
> |
54 |
|
55 |
One thing that you seem to be missing here. Before Gentoo, I used |
56 |
Mandrake. It had a init thingy. It caused me much grief and is one |
57 |
reason I left Mandrake. I also didn't like the upgrade process either |
58 |
but one reason I chose Gentoo is no init thingy. I wanted to be rid of |
59 |
that. Now, whether it is udev or not, here comes that stupid init |
60 |
thingy just because someone doesn't want to put files where they should |
61 |
be which is not inside /usr. |
62 |
|
63 |
So, given my history with the init thingy, if I do use a init thingy and |
64 |
it fails for whatever reason, I'll be installing something else. I done |
65 |
went down the road of trying to fix one of those stupid things and I |
66 |
have no plan or desire to do so again. I'm also not going to spend |
67 |
hours reinstalling Gentoo either. If, more than likely when, the init |
68 |
thingy fails, I'll be installing something else and I'll most my last |
69 |
sign off message here. One thing about Linux, there are plenty of |
70 |
distros to pick from . I love Gentoo but I like to be able to boot up |
71 |
without dealing with a init thingy that I have to fix when it goes belly |
72 |
up. |
73 |
|
74 |
Dale |
75 |
|
76 |
:-) :-) |
77 |
|
78 |
-- |
79 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
80 |
how you interpreted my words! |