| 1 |
Am Samstag, 5. September 2009 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > > There are lots of people mentioning interactivity problems on their |
| 4 |
> > > Linux machines when compared to Windows or OS X. It's not "1 in a |
| 5 |
> > > thousand". |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > I second that. My whole system becomes quite unresponsive if I only copy |
| 8 |
> > a file of a couple of hundred MBs from an external HDD, say a video of |
| 9 |
> > 600 MB. OK, it's only a relatively slow laptop HDD, but that shouldn't |
| 10 |
> > happen nonetheless. (Gentoo sources with CFQ as standard IO scheduler). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> retry without forced preemption, with Hz=300 and without noticks. Oh, and |
| 13 |
> maybe without extX. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
My current values for those are: |
| 16 |
Preemptive (Low-Latency Desktop) |
| 17 |
1000 Hz timer freq |
| 18 |
Did you mean tickless system with "noticks"? I have this enabled ATM |
| 19 |
And with extX I assume you meant the file systems? I'm aware that ext3 is not |
| 20 |
very efficient with large files, but I can't/don't want to use ext4 yet |
| 21 |
because I need to access the partition from windows. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla' |
| 24 |
Error 96: Found dead mouse in hard drive C: |
Archives