| 1 |
On Samstag 05 September 2009, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Samstag, 5. September 2009 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: |
| 3 |
> > On 09/05/2009 03:06 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > well, and your workload asks for rt. But rt also means overhead, |
| 5 |
> > > reduction of performance. So why cater for 1 in a thousand system and |
| 6 |
> > > punish the other 999? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > There are lots of people mentioning interactivity problems on their |
| 9 |
> > Linux machines when compared to Windows or OS X. It's not "1 in a |
| 10 |
> > thousand". |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I second that. My whole system becomes quite unresponsive if I only copy a |
| 13 |
> file of a couple of hundred MBs from an external HDD, say a video of 600 |
| 14 |
> MB. OK, it's only a relatively slow laptop HDD, but that shouldn't happen |
| 15 |
> nonetheless. (Gentoo sources with CFQ as standard IO scheduler). |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
retry without forced preemption, with Hz=300 and without noticks. Oh, and |
| 19 |
maybe without extX. |
Archives