Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: antlists <antlists@××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] X11 without udev/eudev
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 23:18:37
Message-Id: 18ae899b-a172-75ce-b7e5-b998fb672f46@youngman.org.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] X11 without udev/eudev by "Canek Peláez Valdés"
1 On 22/08/2021 22:59, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
2 > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 3:32 PM <karl@××××××××.se
3 > <mailto:karl@××××××××.se>> wrote:
4 > [...]
5 >
6 > I'll be looking into that, but on some level, why should I be forced to
7 > go around udev. Can't programs be compiled without udev today...
8 >
9 >
10 > Yes, they can, if you (or someone else) write the necessary code, debug
11 > it, maintain it and keep it up to date and fix vulnerabilities and other
12 > errors that inevitably will appear, as it does with every piece of software.
13
14 What you're missing, is that this code IS NOT USED.
15
16 The OP wants to delete a load of code from his system precisely to
17 ELIMINATE vulnerabilities. If the code ain't there, it don't need fixing.
18
19 Yes I take your point, but bloat is bloat, and bloat is a liability.
20
21 Cheers,
22 Wol

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] X11 without udev/eudev Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-user] X11 without udev/eudev "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>