1 |
Mike Myers <fluffymikey <at> gmail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> I think I like your idea better, about distributing binaries. Do you know if |
5 |
something like this is being worked on? I'm certain that a common method to |
6 |
this, like what you're saying, would allow Gentoo to become scalable to the |
7 |
point of being easily usable on a large scale. |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
It's a lot of work. I'll be pusing binaries to lots of systems, but, it going |
11 |
to take me months to get ready. I was hoping others with similar goals would |
12 |
'band together' to come up with a solution that combines the needs for the |
13 |
casual user as well as those of us that want to manage dozens to hundres |
14 |
of Gentoo systems..... |
15 |
|
16 |
I need to refine the idea, and my goal is mostly embedded gentoo sytems, but, |
17 |
they are very similar to gentoo-servers. Expanding the idea to workstation, |
18 |
at least for core software, is not that difficult. |
19 |
|
20 |
I do not intend to get into 'competiion' with the devs, particularly on |
21 |
applications that are big, complex, or prone to breakage (OO).... |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
It'd really be better to do this as a group, but, I've found little interest, |
25 |
most probably due to the fact that most folks are already bogged down with |
26 |
their own ambitions. |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
James |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |