| 1 |
On Thursday, 15. September 2011 11:25:56 Joost Roeleveld wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday, September 15, 2011 01:58:59 AM Trifu Catalin Florin wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thursday, 15. September 2011 01:16:12 Trifu Catalin Florin wrote: |
| 4 |
> <snipped undecypherable part> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > ---- |
| 7 |
> > Dear Michael |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Thank you for your help! |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > I didn't reboot my machine as the installation is not complete yet. How |
| 12 |
> > can I reboot when the installation isn't finish, if things that should |
| 13 |
> > work don't work in the first place? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I could not find the currently running kernel you are using in this thread. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It's 2.6.19-something. |
| 18 |
He hit's a problem with new coreutils running on kernels older than 2.6.22 |
| 19 |
Something related to futimesat, that was introduced with this kernel. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> Possibly, you are hitting an issue caused by a feature lacking in that |
| 22 |
> kernel. What did you boot your machine with prior to starting the |
| 23 |
> installation? Please also include the version and URL where you downloaded |
| 24 |
> this from. |
| 25 |
> > I didn't try your advices as I don't now how to try them. How do I |
| 26 |
> > deactivate sandbox? |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Michael "grimlog" Schreckenbauer actually already told you how to do this: |
| 29 |
> ** |
| 30 |
> If you cannot upgrade your kernel right now, you can disable the sandbox |
| 31 |
> FEATURES="-sandbox" in /etc/make.conf |
| 32 |
> (I do not recommend this) |
| 33 |
> ** |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> The "sandbox" is a security feature. If you disable it to get the install |
| 36 |
> working and a newer kernel-version. Please undo this change after the first |
| 37 |
> boot into the new kernel. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Ack. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
> > > I tried to search for |
| 42 |
> > |
| 43 |
> > "touch: setting times of" gentoo |
| 44 |
> > but I don't understand how this is related to my problem. |
| 45 |
> > |
| 46 |
> > Yahoo reply broken? I don't know what to say about that... gmail works |
| 47 |
> > in |
| 48 |
> > the same way, outlook in the same way, thunderbird in the same way. |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
> In other words, they're all broken. |
| 51 |
> A good Email client will allow you to send non-HTML email. Puts "quote" |
| 52 |
> marks in front of the lines and add a "bladibla wrote this" or similar |
| 53 |
> line. It should also allow you to easily put your reply at the bottom of |
| 54 |
> the email. |
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
> GMail has been mentioned a few times as doing things wrongly. I won't even |
| 57 |
> mention the many ways in which MS Outlook does things badly and Thunderbird |
| 58 |
> wants to be a copy of MS Outlook. |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
Afaict, there are quite a few people here using thunderbird. Most replies are |
| 61 |
wellformed. Outlook, well... it's not a mail-client after all. |
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
Best, |
| 64 |
Michael |
Archives