Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: n952162 <n952162@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] No news on kernel upgrade?
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:01:45
Message-Id: cddac284-e422-0c6d-d2cb-f711acda96d3@web.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] No news on kernel upgrade? by Dale
1 On 2/9/21 10:05 AM, Dale wrote:
2 > n952162 wrote:
3 >> Are extra administrative steps necessary when --sync brings in a new
4 >> kernel, as in:
5 >>
6 >>   https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Kernel/Upgrade
7 >>
8 >> I currently have this situation:
9 >>
10 >> $ uname -a
11 >> Linux host *4.19.72-gentoo* #7 SMP Tue Jun 9 19:51:52 CEST 2020 x86_64
12 >> GNU/Linux
13 >>
14 >> $ eselect kernel list
15 >> Available kernel symlink targets:
16 >>   [1]   linux-5.4.72-gentoo
17 >>   [2]   linux-5.4.80-gentoo-r1
18 >>   [3]   linux-5.4.92-gentoo
19 >>
20 >> If an update requires additional steps, shouldn't that have appeared
21 >> in the news?
22 >>
23 >>
24 >
25 > It depends I think.  I say think because there may be a binary kernel
26 > available which will upgrade itself.  I seem to recall reading about it
27 > on a mailing list somewhere.  I have no experience with it tho.  That
28 > said, if you use the old method, you have to upgrade the kernel
29 > yourself.  There are scripts you can use to help automate it a good bit
30 > but some of us still do it the manual way.  When you do updates, emerge
31 > will pull in the new sources but the rest is up to you.  I suspect most
32 > that do it the old way, copy .config over to the new kernel directory,
33 > run make oldconfig and answer the questions, compile the new kernel,
34 > copy it to /boot using the right method which there is a few of and then
35 > configure your bootloader if needed.  The link you posted explains this
36 > in more detail, and may be more complete too.
37 >
38 > I'm trying to remember what that binary kernel thing is called.  I just
39 > skimmed the messages so it could be something else or not even in the
40 > tree yet.
41 >
42 > Dale
43 >
44 > :-)  :-)
45 >
46
47 Ah, maybe I have a theory what's going on ... maybe there's no news that
48 it's time to upgrade the kernel, because it's not meant that the kernel
49 necessarily needs to be upgraded ... except that it seems that the
50 virtualbox-modules package might have a (unfortunate) dependency on that...

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] No news on kernel upgrade? Michael <confabulate@××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] No news on kernel upgrade? Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>