1 |
Am Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 05:12:07PM +0000 schrieb antlists: |
2 |
> On 07/01/2021 02:22, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
3 |
> > On 04/01/2021 23:37, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
4 |
> > > However I noticed that the latter procuces larger files for the same |
5 |
> > > quality |
6 |
> > > setting. So currently, I first save with a very high setting from |
7 |
> > > Showfoto |
8 |
> > > and then recompress the whole directory in a one-line-loop using |
9 |
> > > imagemagick’s convert. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> > You lose some extra quality when doing this due to recompression. What |
12 |
> > you should do is save in a lossless format (like png or bmp) and then |
13 |
> > convert that to jpg. |
14 |
|
15 |
But that would lose a lot of EXIF stuff in the process. I know that |
16 |
recompression reduces quality, that’s why I use a very high setting |
17 |
(98…100) for the intermediate file. |
18 |
|
19 |
> If you're doing that (which I recommend), I set my camera to "raw + jpeg", |
20 |
> and then dump the raw files to DVD. That way, it doesn't matter what happens |
21 |
> to the jpegs as you can always re-create them. |
22 |
|
23 |
I don’t really live the RAW way. They take up sooo much space and my |
24 |
camera’s OOC jpegs always look far nicer than anything I can produce with |
25 |
darktable/rawtherapee. Most of the time there are colour fringes and |
26 |
sometimes sensor patterns that I can’t get rid of. I already have a backlock |
27 |
of several 100, if not 1000 pictures. Working from RAW would take even more |
28 |
time. In some specific scenes I actually use RAW+Jpeg, mostly in scenes with |
29 |
a very high dyamic range. But as I said, the results are not very |
30 |
satisfactory. |
31 |
|
32 |
> If you've only got jpegs (why are you using a rubbish camera :-) |
33 |
|
34 |
I have an Olympus O-MD E-M5 MkII and a MkIII, that’s far from rubbish. ;-) |
35 |
But the OOC jpegs are so good that I don’t need a lot of post-processing. |
36 |
I tend to read manuals and set up my equipment to get the best result right |
37 |
away, rather than point+shoot and do the enhancements later. |
38 |
|
39 |
> then just dump the original jpegs to DVD - that's why what Google do is so |
40 |
> bad - they compress it to upload it from your Android phone, and then |
41 |
> delete the original! AND THAT'S THE DEFAULT !!! |
42 |
|
43 |
I do some light enhancements on my images (like local contrast, exposure |
44 |
correction, alignment), shrink them to – say, 6 MP – and only keep the |
45 |
result. With convert, this gives me about 500 kB to 2 MB files, depending on |
46 |
the scene and chosen quality from 70 to 90. For 95 % of cases, that’s |
47 |
enough. There are exceptions of course, such as portraits, or the odd |
48 |
animal picture captured in just the right moment. |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ |
52 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. |
53 |
|
54 |
Rather idle around than do nothing at all. |