1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:48:18 -0500, Dale wrote about "Re:
|
5 |
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot":
|
6 |
|
7 |
[snip]
|
8 |
>I wish you could convince the devs of that. I already have /var on |
9 |
>its own and was planning to put /usr on its own. I'm not now tho. |
10 |
>Looks like /, /boot, /home and that's it for the OS part. It |
11 |
>downright sucks. |
12 |
|
13 |
I have also been following the discussion on gentoo-dev, although I
|
14 |
currently only lurk there. I was going to register and post with a
|
15 |
suggestion that everything should be on the root partition; that way we
|
16 |
could rename it C: and be compliant with the "industry standard".
|
17 |
|
18 |
However, it gets worse: one cannot safely fsck a partition or logical
|
19 |
volume once it has been mounted. As things currently stand, there are
|
20 |
no statically linked fsck modules for ext2/3/4, as static linkage was
|
21 |
dropped from e2fsprogs about 3 years ago. This means for fsck to run
|
22 |
inside an initramfs or intrd, the image will have to contain glibc,
|
23 |
libpthread and a whole slew of other large libraries in order to run
|
24 |
e2fsck with dynamic linkage. The initramfs will end up being *many*
|
25 |
times larger than the kernel itself. [On my systems, the vmlinuz file
|
26 |
is only about 1.8 megs, and glibc alone makes that look really puny.]
|
27 |
|
28 |
Welcome to progress.
|
29 |
- --
|
30 |
Regards,
|
31 |
|
32 |
Dave [RLU #314465]
|
33 |
======================================================================
|
34 |
dwnoon@××××××××.com (David W Noon)
|
35 |
======================================================================
|
36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
37 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
|
38 |
|
39 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk5Pr8QACgkQRQ2Fs59Psv+S8ACeMadMIjobzT61nCWoVrlqz0Pz
|
40 |
t50AoLZ83Jgw16BIWg7CD2tCb8hrdRzf
|
41 |
=gDyo
|
42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |