| 1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat 20 August 2011 02:17:06 Dale did opine thusly: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> It was discussed on -dev so far. This is the subject line: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> "Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper |
| 7 |
>> initramfs in the handbook?" |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> I think it will apply to /var to at some point. I think it |
| 10 |
>> sucks. I have /var on a separate partition and want to put /usr |
| 11 |
>> on one to but not now. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> Eh? That's fucking braindead. It also violates everything udev ever |
| 14 |
> intended to do. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> /usr and /var on separate partitions, plus a custom kernel without an |
| 17 |
> initramfs is *exactly* the most common use case for Gentoo.... |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I wish you could convince the devs of that. I already have /var on its |
| 23 |
own and was planning to put /usr on its own. I'm not now tho. Looks |
| 24 |
like /, /boot, /home and that's it for the OS part. It downright sucks. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
You planning to explain this to the devs? Maybe you will have better |
| 27 |
luck. They said it is a dev from Fedora that started this . . . . |
| 28 |
crap. ;-) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Dale |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
:-) :-) |
Archives