1 |
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 13:59:42 David W Noon wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:48:18 -0500, Dale wrote about "Re: |
3 |
> [gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot": |
4 |
> |
5 |
> [snip] |
6 |
> |
7 |
> >I wish you could convince the devs of that. I already have /var on |
8 |
> >its own and was planning to put /usr on its own. I'm not now tho. |
9 |
> >Looks like /, /boot, /home and that's it for the OS part. It |
10 |
> >downright sucks. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I have also been following the discussion on gentoo-dev, although I |
13 |
> currently only lurk there. I was going to register and post with a |
14 |
> suggestion that everything should be on the root partition; that way we |
15 |
> could rename it C: and be compliant with the "industry standard". |
16 |
> |
17 |
> However, it gets worse: one cannot safely fsck a partition or logical |
18 |
> volume once it has been mounted. As things currently stand, there are |
19 |
> no statically linked fsck modules for ext2/3/4, as static linkage was |
20 |
> dropped from e2fsprogs about 3 years ago. This means for fsck to run |
21 |
> inside an initramfs or intrd, the image will have to contain glibc, |
22 |
> libpthread and a whole slew of other large libraries in order to run |
23 |
> e2fsck with dynamic linkage. The initramfs will end up being *many* |
24 |
> times larger than the kernel itself. [On my systems, the vmlinuz file |
25 |
> is only about 1.8 megs, and glibc alone makes that look really puny.] |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Welcome to progress. |
28 |
|
29 |
This is madness. Is there anything we can do to stop it? |
30 |
-- |
31 |
Regards, |
32 |
Mick |