1 |
2017-12-06 2:18 GMT-05:00 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Raffaele Belardi wrote: |
4 |
> > One (~x86) LXDE system completed the switch with no problem, the other |
5 |
> (~amd64) built all |
6 |
> > except two packaged (sdlmame and torcs) which did not build with gcc-7.2 |
7 |
> even before the |
8 |
> > switch to 17.0. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Gentoo devs and arch testers did a good job as usual. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > I'll do the switch on the Gnome system in the next days but up to now I |
13 |
> can say that the |
14 |
> > switch to 17.0 is a _lot_ less painful than switching major compiler |
15 |
> version. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > raffaele |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I'm having trouble with these: |
23 |
> |
24 |
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200 |
25 |
> dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.9.3 |
26 |
> net-libs/webkit-gtk |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Those three, I've had to adjust the USE flags and it may or may not be |
29 |
> profile switch related. If I had to guess, it just happened to pop up |
30 |
> and isn't related to the switch. They are back in the rear compiling as |
31 |
> I type. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
Dale, |
35 |
|
36 |
How did you merge qtwebengine? |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Andrés Becerra Sandoval |