| 1 |
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote: |
| 2 |
> And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my experience. The 4.4 |
| 3 |
> GCC, at least on AMD CPUs, creates noticeably faster code. I recompiled |
| 4 |
> all my packages after I upgraded to 4.4 and it was a noticeable |
| 5 |
> difference. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> But, to make perfectly clear what Alan and Dale have stated previously, |
| 8 |
> it is not a requirement to recompile anything. The binaries that are |
| 9 |
> created still call the same system calls as they did before. The kernel |
| 10 |
> still publishes them in the same locations. And to prove to yourself |
| 11 |
> this is true, grab a statically linked binary, compiled for a stock |
| 12 |
> standard i686, and run it on your machine. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I'd love to be able to experience the speedups of gcc-4.4 and by rights I |
| 15 |
should be able to - my last "rip gentoo apart and put it back together again" |
| 16 |
stunt needed an emerge -e world to fix it all. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
But, and this is the bit that makes me cry, the slowdown from KDE-4.4.5 has |
| 19 |
obliterated all that advantage several times over..... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
raster *really* needs to hurrry up now and release e17 |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives