| 1 |
On Thursday 31 December 2015 12:34:26 Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:19:28AM +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I won't list all my objections here, but I have attached two screen |
| 4 |
> > shots of KMail: one in the standard qt4 KDE environment and the other |
| 5 |
> > in qt5. You can see how much less compact the qt5 version is, |
| 6 |
> > [...] |
| 7 |
> > you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as big again as the qt4. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I don't quite get that. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
?? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > My question to the panel is: is this just a temporary stage of |
| 14 |
> > development, or are we going to have to live with it down the years? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I suppose it's all about the theme and its definition of margins. I |
| 17 |
> dabbled with KF5 last weekend on Arch linux and also find all KDE window |
| 18 |
> decorators except for good'ol Plastic to bee too wasteful with space. |
| 19 |
> OTOH I'm considering bying a laptop soon with 12.5 inch and am still |
| 20 |
> undecided on the resolution (125 or 176 DPI). |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Be thankful we don't have a compulsoliry touch-oriented UI. ;-P |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
A small mercy, indeed. :) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Rgds |
| 28 |
Peter |
Archives