1 |
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> On 6/3/2014 11:10 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> Maybe. The thing is, this is going to keep happening, as more and more |
5 |
>> infrastructure migrates towards systemd. Perhaps a news item everytime |
6 |
>> it happens is unrealistic? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Weren't you the one saying that those of us who were voicing concerns that |
10 |
> systemd proponents were ultimately wanting to FORCE systemd on everyone were |
11 |
> just scare-mongering conspiracy theorists? |
12 |
|
13 |
Who is "forcing" anything? pm-utils has been unmaintained FOR FIVE |
14 |
YEARS. Any project that decides to stop using it is making just the |
15 |
right decision; UPower just did the correct thing. And systemd had |
16 |
*nothing* to do with it, except for providing a better, more reliable |
17 |
alternative. |
18 |
|
19 |
That's what you and many others don't seem to understand: systemd is a |
20 |
*BETTER* implementation for basically *ALL* the hodgepodge of |
21 |
"solutions" that we had before in our plumbing layer. |
22 |
|
23 |
Since systemd provides a better alternative for everything in the |
24 |
stack just above the kernel, more and more projects (probably) will |
25 |
start using it exclusively. That is no systemd's fault; they just |
26 |
worked in a good, integrated solution. Why any project will want to |
27 |
support multiple alternatives for the same functionality, if systemd |
28 |
provides the better one, and almost no distribution works without it? |
29 |
Perhaps if somebody wrote the code they'll do it, but almost all |
30 |
programmers who know what they are doing refuse to work with anything |
31 |
else than systemd |
32 |
|
33 |
You don't like it? Go ahead and take maintainership of pm-utils. Fork |
34 |
UPower. Make better replacements for the components that systemd |
35 |
provides. |
36 |
|
37 |
There is no conspiracy here (although for *SURE* there are |
38 |
scare-mongering conspiracy theorists); there is only developers |
39 |
working in the best possible implementation for our plumbing layer, |
40 |
and other developers realizing that, in Linux at least, supporting |
41 |
anything besides systemd is a freakin' waste of time and resources. |
42 |
|
43 |
Again; you don't like it? Then do something about it instead of |
44 |
posting in *-user lists. |
45 |
|
46 |
Regards. |
47 |
-- |
48 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
49 |
Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias |
50 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |