| 1 |
On 2014-02-20 4:04 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
>> No, actually, I think whatever is defined as the current default should |
| 3 |
>> dictate which group should be required to do the work. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> I think this is where we think differently (regarding this particular |
| 6 |
> point). The work must be done by *whomever* wants to do the job. So if |
| 7 |
> the systemd people want to do a profile that's fine (and this already |
| 8 |
> happened); but if they don't want to, nobody can force them to do it |
| 9 |
> (this is academic right now, since they already did the [pretty trivial] |
| 10 |
> work). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> If the systemd people did not wanted to do the job, then, since you |
| 13 |
> can't force them, the people *not* wanting systemd would be the ones |
| 14 |
> required to do it. And that makes absolutely no sense. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I think we agree, but you keep saying we don't... ;) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The difference is, since OpenRC is the default, all of the existing |
| 19 |
profiles are, by definition, OpenRC based profiles. So, people who don't |
| 20 |
want systemd simply have to do... nothing! |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
As I said before, it is people who want systemd who currently have to |
| 23 |
'do something', and that is as it should be, unless/until the default of |
| 24 |
OpenRC is changed to systemd. |
Archives