1 |
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> On 2014-02-20 4:04 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>>> |
4 |
>>> No, actually, I think whatever is defined as the current default should |
5 |
>>> dictate which group should be required to do the work. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> I think this is where we think differently (regarding this particular |
9 |
>> point). The work must be done by *whomever* wants to do the job. So if |
10 |
>> the systemd people want to do a profile that's fine (and this already |
11 |
>> happened); but if they don't want to, nobody can force them to do it |
12 |
>> (this is academic right now, since they already did the [pretty trivial] |
13 |
>> work). |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> If the systemd people did not wanted to do the job, then, since you |
16 |
>> can't force them, the people *not* wanting systemd would be the ones |
17 |
>> required to do it. And that makes absolutely no sense. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I think we agree, but you keep saying we don't... ;) |
21 |
> |
22 |
> The difference is, since OpenRC is the default, all of the existing profiles |
23 |
> are, by definition, OpenRC based profiles. So, people who don't want systemd |
24 |
> simply have to do... nothing! |
25 |
|
26 |
OK, I see your point. |
27 |
|
28 |
> As I said before, it is people who want systemd who currently have to 'do |
29 |
> something', and that is as it should be, unless/until the default of OpenRC |
30 |
> is changed to systemd. |
31 |
|
32 |
Agreed. |
33 |
|
34 |
Regards. |
35 |
-- |
36 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
37 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
38 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |