| 1 |
On Sunday, 31 December 2017 01:13:26 GMT Ian Zimmerman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2017-12-31 00:33, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 3 |
> > But the whole 4.12 branch has been masked, so that won't do. Here, |
| 4 |
> > I've had to go back to 4.9.49-r1 (amd64, not ~amd64). But now I see |
| 5 |
> > 4.9.72 has been stabilised. I think I'll wait for some stabiliity in |
| 6 |
> > the kernel version offerings before I make another move. Three kernel |
| 7 |
> > compilations on six systems within a week are a few too many. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> FWIW, I find 4.9.73 (upstream, not gentoo) rock solid. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Well, I haven't fallen into whatever holes have been found in other versions |
| 12 |
yet either, as far as I know. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If you don't mind my asking, what factors make you prefer vanilla to gentoo |
| 15 |
sources? (I assume that's what you use.) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Regards, |
| 19 |
Peter. |
Archives