1 |
Michael Mol wrote: |
2 |
> So, my habit is to have /usr sit on top of LVM on top of mdraid. I |
3 |
> really don't want to get into the business of manually managing my own |
4 |
> initramfs, and udev >= 181 will eventually hit stable. I want my |
5 |
> systems ready before that. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Now, having looked at the pertinent documentation, it looks like the |
8 |
> command I need to run is: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> genkernel --lvm --mdadm --disklabel initramfs |
11 |
> |
12 |
> and then add the initramfs to my grub setup. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> The trouble is, genkernel dies on me. I tried for some feedback in |
15 |
> #gentoo-chat, and DrEeevil gave me two clues: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> 13:34 <+DrEeevil> that shouldn't even be possible |
18 |
> 13:36 <+DrEeevil> mikemol: looks like static linking didn't on your system |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I don't know where to take things from here. I'm hesitant to file a |
21 |
> bug on b.g.o, because the tail end of genkernel.log specifically says |
22 |
> not to file build errors as bug reports. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> So...any ideas? This is an amd64 mostly-stable system, and dracut is |
25 |
> still masked on amd64, which is why I'm trying to get genkernel |
26 |
> working. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I've attached genkernel.log |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
If I read the -dev mailing list correctly, they plan to still support |
33 |
/usr without a init thingy. After all the mess I went through, we may |
34 |
not need the init thingy after all. |
35 |
|
36 |
Go figure. |
37 |
|
38 |
Dale |
39 |
|
40 |
:-) :-) |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
44 |
how you interpreted my words! |
45 |
|
46 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
47 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |