| 1 |
Excellent! Sounds like everyone likes QEMU, so I'm definitely going to |
| 2 |
give it a shot. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
One other question... With Win4Lin, for example, one can start the |
| 5 |
Windows session in lieu of an X session--so all the user sees is |
| 6 |
Windows. My users will be accessing the server via VNC so this feature |
| 7 |
of Win4Lin works out pretty well. Does QEMU support anything like this |
| 8 |
or does it need to be run from within an X session? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Thanks again to everyone for their opinion of QEMU! |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
~ Tom |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Tom Smith wrote: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
>Hi all, |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>I've been using Win4Lin TS 3.0 for some time to server Win98SE to five |
| 19 |
>remote users for legacy application support. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
>I'm currently testing the recently released Win4Lin Pro TS server |
| 22 |
>running Win2k as an intended replacement for the old TS server. This is |
| 23 |
>where I came across QEMU... |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
>QEMU appears to have functionality similar to VMWare (I haven't tried it |
| 26 |
>yet). I'm curious to here other Gentoo users' experience with this |
| 27 |
>software. I will be using in a production environment so stability and |
| 28 |
>uptime are very important, as are reasonable performance. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
>I would very much appreciate any feedback you all can give me about your |
| 31 |
>experience with QEMU. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
>Best Wishes, |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
>Tom |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives