| 1 |
> One more question. What is a easy to install but WELL tested and STABLE |
| 2 |
> binary distro? I'm thinking something that needs a update 2 or 3 times a |
| 3 |
> year or something. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
If you want a *really* well tested and *really* stable linux binary |
| 6 |
distro, Debian stable is your friend :D |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I have a debian install on my home desktop (used by my sister and my |
| 9 |
parents); I choosed debian basically because I didn't wanted to |
| 10 |
bother: I just wanted to install and update once in a while. I'm |
| 11 |
really happy with it. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Pros: |
| 14 |
- stable |
| 15 |
- tested |
| 16 |
- once configured, requires minimal maintenance. Basically, all you |
| 17 |
have to do is apt-get update && apt-get upgrade once in while. It'll |
| 18 |
install only security fixes. No headaches, no massive breakage or |
| 19 |
something. At least, this is my experience. |
| 20 |
- easy and fast installation |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Cons: |
| 23 |
- softwares tend to be outdated on stable. On my debian stable I have |
| 24 |
Gnome 2.30.2, Firefox (iceweasel) 3.5.16, OpenOffice 3.2.1... Consider |
| 25 |
that debian stable versions are released, on average, every two years. |
| 26 |
- debian has its own way to do things. I had to get used to it... |
| 27 |
- the default DE is gnome; if you want kde you have to install |
| 28 |
yourself, and, needless to say, it is not the last version [1] |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
The biggest cons about debian stable is outdated software... If you |
| 31 |
can cope with it/it is not a priority, give it a try. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Otherwise, the previous suggestions (Ubuntu, Kubuntu, OpenSUSE etc) |
| 34 |
are all good choiches - stable, tested, up-to-date. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
[1] http://packages.debian.org/en/squeeze/kde-full |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Best regards, |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Lorenzo |
Archives