| 1 |
On 11/1/05, Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> >A really really dumb bit of code in Portage itself was changed. See the |
| 7 |
> >gentoo-portage-dev list archives if you want technical details. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> Is that the same reason it was sticking at 50% or so? If so there is a |
| 12 |
> thread about it on the forums too. I hope that fixed it. My old 200MHz |
| 13 |
> machine got a heck of a workout. LOL It took 30 minutes to go from 49% |
| 14 |
> to 51%. The rest wasn't much better. LOL |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Yeah.. I sync'ed portage yesterday and still took forever to finish. |
| 18 |
Although all the way is slow and painful, the worst part was indeed from 50% |
| 19 |
to 52%.. these 2% take SOOOOOO loooooong.... |
| 20 |
You say that your old 200MHz took 30m? I'd say my laptop took "at least" 30m |
| 21 |
yesterday to do it.. and it's a 2.4Ghz... I even think that each update gets |
| 22 |
worst and worst.... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Fernando |
Archives