| 1 |
Le mar. 28 déc. 2021 à 14:03, Jacques Montier <jmontier@×××××.com> a écrit : |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Le mar. 28 déc. 2021 à 13:32, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> a écrit : |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> William Kenworthy wrote: |
| 9 |
>> > A point to keep in mind - if you can feel the drive moving it may be |
| 10 |
>> > generating errors! Depending on the drive, the errors may just be |
| 11 |
>> > handled internally and I can see it slowing things down though |
| 12 |
>> > probably would be barely noticeable. I have seen it myself with |
| 13 |
>> > random errors from a WD green drive disappearing when properly |
| 14 |
>> > immobilised. When investigating I ran across articles discussing the |
| 15 |
>> > problem, one of which fastened the drives to a granite slab for |
| 16 |
>> > tests! Also see discussions on NAS seups and vibrations affecting co |
| 17 |
>> > located drives. |
| 18 |
>> > |
| 19 |
>> > BillK |
| 20 |
>> > |
| 21 |
>> > ** Interesting read |
| 22 |
>> > https://www.ept.ca/features/everything-need-know-hard-drive-vibration/ |
| 23 |
>> > |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> This is just because it is a SMR drive. It's done this ever since I |
| 26 |
>> bought the drive and it has passed all tests. There's a whole thread on |
| 27 |
>> this dating back several years. I managed to buy a SMR drive before I |
| 28 |
>> even knew they existed. Once it fills up that PMR section, it gets |
| 29 |
>> really slow. |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
>> Dale |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>> :-) :-) |
| 34 |
>> |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
> Hello all, |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Thanks a lot for all your responses ! |
| 39 |
> I think this issue is kernel related. |
| 40 |
> No problem with 5.10.76-gentoo-r1, but the issue appears |
| 41 |
> with 5.15.11-gentoo. |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> I read on the net that it could be possible to desactivate the sata |
| 44 |
> protocol NCQ (Native Command Queuing) |
| 45 |
> So, in the grub file, i added the |
| 46 |
> ligne GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=libata.force=noncq |
| 47 |
> Now, all the errors messages are gone and the booting time gets down to |
| 48 |
> 24s with the two kernel versions. |
| 49 |
> BUT : do you think it could damage or slow down my SSD and HDD disks ? |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> Thanks again, |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> Regards, |
| 54 |
> |
| 55 |
> -- |
| 56 |
> Jacques |
| 57 |
> |
| 58 |
> |
| 59 |
> |
| 60 |
> Me again ! |
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
Well, il cleaned my dusty mobo, unplugged and plugged again the sata cables. |
| 63 |
Now, with or without NCQ, boot time is rather short (~28s). |
| 64 |
So it seems it was a connection problem. |
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
I still have some errors as : |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
............................................ |
| 69 |
[ 24.708377] ata6.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x50400001 SErr 0x4010000 |
| 70 |
action 0xe frozen |
| 71 |
[ 24.708385] ata6.00: irq_stat 0x00400040, connection status changed |
| 72 |
[ 24.708387] ata6: SError: { PHYRdyChg DevExch } |
| 73 |
[ 24.708390] ata6.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED |
| 74 |
[ 24.708391] ata6.00: cmd 60/08:00:78:08:c0/00:00:31:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq |
| 75 |
dma 4096 in |
| 76 |
res 40/00:00:78:08:c0/00:00:31:00:00/40 Emask 0x10 |
| 77 |
(ATA bus error) |
| 78 |
[ 24.708397] ata6.00: status: { DRDY } |
| 79 |
.......................................... |
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
To be sure, i'll buy some news sata cables. |
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
Sorry for the noise and thanks again for having helped me. |
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
Regards, |
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
-- |
| 88 |
Jacques |
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
> |
| 95 |
> |
Archives