Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3?
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:24:53
Message-Id: 20130424092438.0f0ff88a@hactar.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? by Walter Dnes
1 On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:22:37 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
2
3 > I have mix of various sizes. The best feature about ReiserFS is that
4 > it doesn't do inodes, so I don't have to be psychic about my future file
5 > mix when I format the partition. For that reason alone, I'm tempted to
6 > stay with ReiserFS3. I'm aware of the booby traps...
7 >
8 > - *NEVER EVER* have an uncompressed ReiserFS image on a ReiserFS
9 > partition
10 >
11 > - avoid Postfix and Qmail
12
13 Why? I ask because I have a mail server with reiserfs on the mail spool,
14 it's been running for several years and behaved impeccably, but if there
15 is a good reason to switch, I will.
16
17
18 --
19 Neil Bothwick
20
21 X-Modem- A device on the losing end of an encounter with lightning.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>