Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Daniel Pielmeier <daniel.pielmeier@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is equery depends still viable
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:49:00
Message-Id: 491B5D4E.40608@googlemail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Is equery depends still viable by Harry Putnam
1 Harry Putnam schrieb am 12.11.2008 23:43:
2 > Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> writes:
3 >
4 >> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 22:04:52 Harry Putnam wrote:
5 >>> With recent changes in portage in the last few mnths, is equery in
6 >>> general and `equery depends' in particular still reliable?
7 >> I use it fairly often still, but do notice I get a lot of null
8 >> output. So I no longer trust it fully. At least it doesn't give
9 >> false positives - what's in the putput really is a valid depend.
10 >
11 > Do you know off hand if there are any alternatives?
12 >
13 >
14 >
15
16 emerge -pv --depclean atom

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Is equery depends still viable Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>