| 1 |
Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 22/03/14 14:48, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 3/22/2014 5:06 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Please don't use this list for personal quarrels of any kind! |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> If someone says something you don't like - just ignore it/him. |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> If someone insults you, reply by personal mail only. |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>> If someone says something which is*technically* wrong, |
| 12 |
>>>> just correct the facts without getting personal. |
| 13 |
>>> I don't read every message but who is personally attacking someone? |
| 14 |
>> He's probably referring to my factual statement that Tom was/is acting |
| 15 |
>> like an arrogant prick. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Lots of people confuse factual statements with personal attacks. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> That said, I've never been know for being tactful... ;) |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> Go and solve this shit off-list. I'm not following the systemd thread |
| 22 |
> but over the last few days but your (plural) quarrels have become far |
| 23 |
> too big in number to ignore. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Create a separate thread if you need it so that people can ignore it |
| 26 |
> without missing actual on-topic messages. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Will, since Tom finally got the point and changed his email program to |
| 30 |
not CC his replies, it seems to me that Tanstaaf, others and myself were |
| 31 |
right. It may have been off topic but if Tom would have just listened |
| 32 |
in the beginning, there wouldn't have to be so many off topic replies. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Just saying. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Dale |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
:-) :-) |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives