| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Jonas de Buhr <jonas.de.buhr@×××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
>>> between a fully-signed system (Windows 9 / OS XI or so) or a cracked |
| 3 |
>>> boot, with little in the way of switching between the two, at least |
| 4 |
>>> initially |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> I know which one I'd pick if it came down to it :) |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>And you really need not worry about it, some geek (Torvalds?) will |
| 9 |
>>surely find out a way. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> yes, there will most likely be a technical way to circumvent it. the |
| 12 |
> problem is that involved companies might try (and likely succeed) to |
| 13 |
> make that illegal. |
| 14 |
> the reasoning will be this: it is assumed that you only make that |
| 15 |
> modification to run pirated copies of commercial operating systems. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> that you will also need that mod to run free operating systems on it |
| 18 |
> will just not count. at least not for commercially offering the mod. |
| 19 |
> just look at decss. or playstation mod chips. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I thought this is where we already are? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
:wq |
Archives